9/11 War Crimes Tribunal expected to issue Indictments of Accused in 9/11 events on January 22, 2013

9/11 War Crimes Tribunal Judges Alfred Lambremont Webre & Constance Fogal, June 17, 2012

9/11 War Crimes Tribunal expected to issue Indictments of Accused in 9/11 events on January 22, 2013

VANCOUVER, B.C. - The 9/11 Vancouver Hearings were held at The Denman Theatre, 15-17 June 2012, 1737 Comox Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada, with co-organizers James H. Fetzer, Ph.D. and Joshua Blakeney with the coordination of Kevin Barrett and John Duddy. As set out at www.911vancouverhearings.com, the stated objectives of the 9/11 Vancouver Hearings included: (1) "To evaluate and to move beyond the 'official account' of 9/11" through original presentations by expert speakers on 9/11; and (2) Establishment of the 9/11 Vancouver Tribunal under Judge Constance Fogal, B.A , M.A, B.ED, LL.B & Judge Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd to hear sworn declarations of probable cause from 9/11 Vancouver Hearings speakers as to the involvement of key individuals in the common plan and conspiracy of 9/11, leading to an Indictment of key 9/11 Accused.

The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal is a citizen's tribunal of conscience that was duly constituted at the 9/11 Vancouver Hearings June 15-17, 2012 in Vancouver, B.C.

Alfred Lambremont Webre, one of the Judges on the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal states, "As a duly constituted citizen's tribunal of conscience for the events of September 11, 2001, the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal has jurisdiction under natural law and justice; declarations of natural law, such as the U.N. Declaration of Human Rights; international humanitarian law such as the Geneva Conventions; and national laws such as national, state and provincial criminal statues prohibiting murder and conspiracy for any jurisdiction whose citizens died in the World Trade Center on 9/11. The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal was convened by a worldwide community of citizens who participated in the 911 Vancouver Hearings (June 15-17, 2012) in Vancouver, BC and via streaming internet from diverse locations around the world including the United States, India, and elsewhere."

During the 9/11 Vancouver Hearings, 19 expert witnesses gave sworn testimony as to names, titles, and implicating evidence for individuals, each of whom is alleged to have acted as part of a common plan as a leading co-conspirator in the events of 9/11 and for whom they are aware of prima facie evidence that is sufficient to raise a presumption of fact. Further 9/11 expert and eye witnesses have given sworn affidavit evidence before the Tribunal since the 9/11 Vancouver Hearings and more 9/11 witnesses and evidence may be heard by the Tribunal before the 9/11 War Crimes Indictment is issued on January 22, 2013

9/11 War Crimes Indictment

Following the June 15-17, 2012 9/11 Vancouver Hearings, these 19 sworn expert witnesses and additional expert and eye witnesses on 9/11 have been requested to file further written submissions and affidavits with the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal on or before Oct. 1, 2012 as to individuals for whom there is prima facie evidence that they acted as part of a common plan in the events of 9/11. Each expert witness is being asked to provide a detailed summary of implicating evidence for each such individual named.

International Criminal Court (ICC)

By Oct. 1, 2012, the Tribunal will review the total number of 9/11 expert witnesse submissions, and may request further submissions, particularly with regard to persons of interest who may have participated as key members of a common plan and conspiracy in 9/11 and who are citizens of nations other that the United States of America and Israel. Article 12 of the ICC Statute requires that the Accused be a citizen of a nation that is a signatory to the Rome Statute of the ICC, which neither the United States nor Israel are. Additional expert witnesses will be providing reasonable cause showing that named citizens of the United Kingdom, France and Canada acted as key initiators and funders of the 9/11 common plan and conspiracy.

By contrast, the 9/11 Vancouver Hearings witnesses provided information as to citizens of Israel and the United States for whom there was reasonable cause as to their acting as key 9/11 co-conspirators. A number of the 9/11 witnesses, including Prof. Jim Fetzer, Greg Felton, and Donald Fox have as of Sept. 26, 2012, requested that their sworn 9/11 submissions been withdrawn from the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal docket because the Tribunal has chosen to include the affidavits of independent scientist Leuren Moret, MA, PhD ABD and Andrew D. Basiago in the Tribunal witness Docket.

In a Notice of Decision dated Sept. 26, 2012, the Tribunal per curiam stated, "As an independent Tribunal of Conscience, the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal, Judge Constance Fogal, B.A , M.A, B.ED, LL.B & Judge Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd Presiding Judges are utterly independent of, and not subject to any direction or oversight by, any party other than their own Conscience, including the organizers and speakers of the 9/11 Vancouver Hearings. The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal, Judge Constance Fogal, B.A , M.A, B.ED, LL.B & Judge Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd Presiding Judges have sole right and responsibility as to the scope of investigation, selection and calling of 9/11 Tribunal witnesses and evidence, evaluation of 9/11 Tribunal witnesses and evidence, and the 9/11 Indictment. The scope of investigation, selection and calling of 9/11 Tribunal witnesses and evidence, evaluation of 9/11 Tribunal witnesses and evidence, and the 9/11 Indictment is not limited to such as established at the time of the 9/11 Vancouver Hearings. This Tribunal considers it vital to pursue investigation of citizens of the UK, France, and Canada who, according to preliminary of a 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal witness evidentiary submission, served as key co-conspirators in 9/11, thus satisfying the jurisdictional requirements of Article 12 of the Rome Statute of the ICC. Moreover, This Tribunal considers it vital to accept the sworn testimony of an officer of the court of the state of Washington who has direct eye witness evidence as to former U.S. Secretary of State Donald H. Rumsfeld's mens rea as to the events of 9/11 in 1971. The Tribunal rejects the efforts by the organizers of the 9/11 Vancouver Hearings and certain 9/11 witnesses to prevent the Tribunal from accepting and entering into evidence the evidentiary submissions of Leuren Moret, MA, PhD ABD and Andrew D. Basiago, JD, MPhil (Cantab), and finds such efforts misguided and parochial. It is through the evidence of 9/11 Vancouver witness Leuren Moret that the ICC can acquire jurisdiction over named 9/11 Accused under Article 13 of the Rome Statute of the ICC in this matter, for example. It is through the evidence of 9/11 Vancouver witness Andrew D. Basiago that this Tribunal has independent sworn eye-witness testimony of the personal knowledge in 1971 of Donald H. Rumsfeld, a principal person of interest at this stage in the formulating the 9/11 Indictment.

From these evidentiary submissions, the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal plans to develop and issue an Information and Indictment of individuals alleged to have participated in a criminal, common plan and conspiracy to carry out the events of September 11, 2001.

9/11 War Crimes Indictment

The 9/11 Information and Indictment is expected to issue on January 22, 2013. The Information and Indictment will be accompanied by an Evidentiary Report, setting out the evidence of probable cause for the indictments of the Accused.

The Tribunal had originally expected to issue an Indictment around Labor Day 2012. However, the process of gathering Evidentiary Submissions and Affidavits from expert 9/11 witnesses has taken longer that anticipated. In addition, the Tribunal may be calling additional witnesses with regard to U.K., French and Canadian 9/11 persons of interest.

Legal implications of the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal

Following the issuance of an Information and Indictment against specific named individuals who allegedly participated in a common plan and conspiracy in the events of 9/11, there are multiple legal venues in which the criminal charges in the Information and Indictment can be prosecuted and tried, and verdicts and judgments reached and enforced against the 9/11 Accused.

A. International law - The alleged crimes of the Accused in the Information and Indictment may be found to violate the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and constitute war crimes, genocide and crimes against humanity. At the June 15-17, 2012 9/11 Vancouver Hearings Judge Alfred Lambremont Webre stated, "The 9/11 false flag operations may qualify as a crime against peace, war crime, genocide, and crime against humanity, inter alia, if it can be demonstrated that the true intent of the 9/11 perpetrators was to carry out 9/11 as a pretext for invading Afghanistan, which invasion and war has been found to be genocidal because of the use of depleted uranium weapons and other reasons. So the legal chain of culpability is there, under the Nuremberg precedents of a crime against peace and starting an unjust war. The Tokyo Tribunal for War Crimes in Afghanistan, in an opinion by Judge Niloufer Bhagwat, found that U.S. President George W. Bush and his administration had committed war crimes, genocide, and crimes against humanity through the horrific birth defects and other widespread genetic and health damage cause to Afghan civilians through the U.S. use of depleted uranium weapons."

The 9/11 War Crimes Indictment can be taken by the 9/11 Tribunal to the national courts of any of the more than 100 nations, such as Germany and Spain, that are signatories to the Rome statue of the International Criminal Court (ICC) for prosecution and enforcement, as well as to the ICC itself. The chief prosecutor of the ICC, to the criticism of many throughout the world, has failed to act on over 400 complaints on war crimes in Iraq and in Afghanistan by US and UK forces, and has privately stated he will not take jurisdiction of 9/11.
Organization of American States - According to one source, "The Vancouver 9/11 Indictment can also be submitted to the Organization of American States (OAS) which might be an even better choice since it has the only international criminal court the U.S. has signed onto and the other OAS member countries may not be so biased in favor the U.S. One attorney took the U.S. government as a defendant there to get an opinion on the fact that the US used Depleted Uranium weapons on hospitals in Granada during the U.S. attack on Granada. She won and the U.S. had to rebuild all the hospitals they destroyed in Granada. She never would have achieved that victory in any other international courts."

B. U.S. Congress - The 9/11 War Crimes Indictment can be taken by the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal to the U.S. Senate and to the U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary Committee for the appointment of a Special Prosecutor to prosecute the Accused Treason under Article III of the U.S. Constitution, which provides, "Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court. The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted."

There is legal precedent for such an action. In November 2007, a Memorandum was presented to senior Congressional staff and personally to Rep John Conyers, Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee setting out sufficient prima facie evidence of Article III(3) treason in connection with the events of 9/11 by George W. Bush, Richard B. Cheney, Donald H. Rumsfeld, and other Jane and John Does. Senior Congressional staff acknowledged the seriousness of the allegations in the Memorandum. Rep. Conyers took the Memorandum home to Detroit, MI over the Thanksgiving 2007 holidays promising an answer as to whether he would move on the file after the Holidays. To this date, no answer has been forthcoming from Rep. Conyers.

C. Canadian Parliament - There are various concurrent efforts to have the Parliament of Canada investigate the 9/11 events, as NORAD is a joint Canada/USA function and 26 Canadians were killed at the World Trade Center on 9/11. The 9/11 Vancouver Indictment can be taken by the 9/11 Vancouver Tribunal to members of Parliament and the Senate, including the Prime Minister and the Opposition Leaders in the Parliament of Canada to appoint a Public Inquiry to investigate and report on possible criminal violations by Canadian persons or U.S. persons, including U.S. government employees or contractors/agents, and other individuals flowing out of the 9/11 events.

D. Prosecution for murder - The 9/11 War Crimes Indictment can be taken by the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal to any District attorney and/or U.S. Attorneys in the United States of America, and to any Public Prosecutors in other nations whose citizens were killed in the World Trade Center or the events of 9/11. The alleged Accused, Co-conspirators and persons acting in a common plan to cause, facilitate or support the events of September 11, 2001 can each be prosecuted for murder by a U.S. attorney, by a district attorney or by public prosecutors of a nation whose citizens were killed at the World Trade Center or in any aspect of the false flag operation on September 11, 2001.

E. 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal - The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal can establish a formal Tribunal for a trial of the Accused under the 9/11 War Crimes Indictment. This trial would be heard by the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal Judges, with appointed prosecutors, counsel for the Accused and due process for the Accused. A sister tribunal of conscience, the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal, has successfully tried George W. Bush, Tony Blair, Richard B. Cheney, Donald H. Rumsfeld, et al. for war crimes in Iraq.

9/11 War Crimes Tribunal

Judges on the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal include Constance (Connie) Fogal, B.A, B.Ed, M.A., LL.B, and Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd. Connie Fogal is former leader of the Canadian Action Party, former Vancouver Parks Board Commissioner, former Director, Kitsilano and Vancouver Community Resource boards; lawyer with the Defence of Canadian Liberty Committee to oppose what Fogal sees as threats to Canadian constitutional sovereignty. Alfred Lambremont Webre is a Judge on the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal, submitted a Memorandum to the Chairman of the U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary Committee calling for the appointment of a special prosecutor to investigate 9/11 and was a co-architect of the Space Preservation Treaty.

The 9/11 Vancouver Hearings were organized by under Professor Jim Fetzer, PhD, McKnight Professor Emeritus at the University of Minnesota Duluth, the founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, who edited its first book, THE 9/11 CONSPIRACY (2007), organized its first conference, “The Science and Politics of 9/11″ (Madison) and produced its first DVD; and co-organizer Joshua Blakeney, Graduate student at the University of Lethbridge, 9/11 activist, Staff Writer at Veterans Today, and now the Canadian correspondent for PressTV, who was awarded the Queen Elizabeth II Graduate Scholarship to study “The Origins of the Global War on Terror”.

Information:

www.911warcrimestribunal.org

Link

Views: 275

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Need to be !

Bush senior that is, because his 'Yes Dad' son had everything organised for him and just followed orders.

RSS

Donations for YouRTubeNews ...

Please donate to our website so that we can continue to offer you the latest news.

Donations as of Mar. 25 .. $509.00 .. thankyou.


 




Real News ...

Click Here

Breaking News:

Truth will set us free

UnSlaveMe News

To control which emails you receive on YouRTubeNews,CLICK HERE


free counters

 

Moon

CURRENT MOON

We're a friendly group who enjoy keeping up with the news and searching for truth.

© 2017   Created by UnSlaveMe.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service